• Skip to content
Healthy Markets Logo
Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • What We Do
    • Members
    • Leadership Team
    • Join Us
    • Contact Us
  • Initiatives
    • Promoting Robust Public Capital Markets
    • ATS Transparency
    • Benchmark Integrity
    • Best Execution
    • Concentration and Competition
    • Market Data
    • Order Routing Transparency
  • Publications
    • ATS Questionnaire
    • Benchmark Linked Investments
    • Better Best Execution
    • Dark Side of the Pools
    • The Future of Research in the US After MiFID II
    • Market Data
    • Market Structure Insights
    • Order Routing Questionnaire
    • Research Practices Questionnaire
    • Regulatory Letters and Testimony
  • In The News
  • Press Releases
  • Events

2016 ATS RISK ASSESSMENT

Investors and routing brokers are increasingly focused on understanding and assessing the risks posed by the venues on which they trade. The Healthy Markets 2016 ATS Risk Assessment is designed to help them do that. This Report examines 18 of the leading US equity alternative trading systems (ATSs), exploring how they operate, their trading characteristics, and the risks they pose.

The full 173-page report is available to only Healthy Markets Members.

The Report contains three main sections: ATS Risks Comparisons, ATS Quantitative Comparisons, and the Individual ATS Risk Assessments.

The ATS Risks Comparisons Section compares ATSs on overall risks, as well as across four key risk categories:

  • Conflicts of interest risks;
  • Information leakage and counterparty risks;
  • Technology risks; and
  • Enforcement risks.

The ATS Quantitative Comparisons Section examines ATSs across five key measures of interest to investors:

  • ATS market share;
  • Average trade size;
  • Midpoint execution rate;
  • Percentage of trading, by market cap of securities traded; and
  • Percentage of trading done in blocks.

The Individual ATS Risks Assessment Section takes deep dives into the operations, characteristics, and risks of each of the 18 ATSs examined.

Information to complete this Report was obtained from public sources, such as ATS websites, FAQs, Forms ATS, and regulators' websites. It also included responses to Healthy Markets' ATS Questionnaire, which includes dozens of detailed, technical quaitons about items ranging from information-leaking order types to smart order router preferencing.

We found significant variations in ATSs' disclosures, operations, and risks. Based on our scoring methodology, we identified 7 ATSs as posing low overall risks 5 as posing medium overall risks, and 6 as having provided inadequate information to meaningfully assess them. I

The 2016 ATS Risk Assessment is an essential source for any institutional investor. For more information about this Report or Healthy Markets Association, please contact us.

STAY IN THE KNOW

Enter your email below to keep up to date with all our latest news and information.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Contact Us

© 2019 Healthy Markets. All Rights Reserved.

×